Galbraith v. Oswald
This text of 205 A.2d 797 (Galbraith v. Oswald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On this appeal the plaintiff-appellant seeks reversal of a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury for the defendant-appellee, in a suit to recover for personal injuries and property damages due to an automobile accident involving automobiles operated by the respective parties. The record before us discloses *621 that at the trial below the appellant made no motion for directed verdict at any time, nor were there any objections made to any of the court’s instructions or refusals to instruct. Likewise, the appellant does not complain in this appeal of any rulings made by the court on any objections made by her during the trial. Under these circumstances this Court on review will not consider the questions presented by the appellant. Maryland Rule 885.
What the appellant really sought here was a review of the trial court’s refusal to grant a new trial. There is nothing in the record to justify departure from the usual rule that this Court will not pass upon the trial court’s action in such cases.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 A.2d 797, 237 Md. 620, 1965 Md. LEXIS 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galbraith-v-oswald-md-1965.