Galaxy Gaming, Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Triangulum Partners, Llc)

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: January 23, 2020
• Docket: 79924
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

GALAXY GAMING, INC.; MARK No. 79924 LIPPARELLI; NORMAN H. DESROSIERS; WILLIAM A. ZENDER; AND BRYAN W. WATERS, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Z3 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, EL, A. BROWN ; IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLER CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE By EPL,TY CL.ERK NANCY L. ALLF, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and TRIANGULUM PARTNERS, LLC, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss. Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Generally, we will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions to dismiss, and we are not persuaded that any exception to the general rule applies here. Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4403. zg-01296/ Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197-98, 179 P.3d 566, 558-59 (2008) (listing exceptions). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge Pisanelli Bice, PLLC Garman Turner Gordon Eighth District Court Clerk

"The Honorable Michael Douglas, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.