Galaxy Export, Inc. v. Bedford Textile Products, Inc.
This text of 84 A.D.2d 572 (Galaxy Export, Inc. v. Bedford Textile Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, false [573]*573advertising and misleading trade practices, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yoswein, J.), dated January 20, 1981, as denied that branch of its motion which was to dismiss plaintiff’s third cause of action. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff’s complaint sets forth a valid cause of action within its third cause of action. False advertising under section 350-a of the General Business Law includes mislabeling. Hopkins, J.P., Gibbons, Rabin and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A.D.2d 572, 443 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galaxy-export-inc-v-bedford-textile-products-inc-nyappdiv-1981.