Galarza v. Diamond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Galarza v. Diamond

139 A.D.2d 421, 526 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3715

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.2d 421 (Galarza v. Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Galarza v. Diamond, 139 A.D.2d 421, 526 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3715 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on March 3, 1987, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, without costs and without disbursements, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service of a copy of the order herein with notice of entry upon her attorney, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $300,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment as so amended and reduced is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on March 3, 1987, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, without costs and without disbursements, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service of a copy of the order herein with notice of entry upon her attorney, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $300,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment as so amended and reduced is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.D.2d 421, 526 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galarza-v-diamond-nyappdiv-1988.