Galanty v. Chrysler Corp.
This text of 460 A.2d 694 (Galanty v. Chrysler Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court having determined that certification was improvidently granted; It is ORDERED that the within appeal be and hereby is dismissed. O’Hern, J., dissents from this Order. He believes that on a motion to dismiss under R. 4:37-2(b), viewing the evidence most favorably to plaintiff, plaintiff had clearly established a consumer claim for breach of warranty under 15 U.S.C.A. 2304(a)(4) of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Dismissal of his claim was error calling for the supervision of this Court under R. 2:12-4. (See 91 N.J. 530)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
460 A.2d 694, 93 N.J. 298, 1983 N.J. LEXIS 2606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galanty-v-chrysler-corp-nj-1983.