Galante v. United States

96 Ct. Cl. 128, 1942 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 96, 1942 WL 4397
United States Court of Claims·Decided April 6, 1942·No. No. 43804·Published

Opinion

[130] The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to re-

cover, in an opinion

fer curiam,

as follows:

The facts in this case are not in dispute. They show plainly that plaintiff’s mother was in fact dependent upon him for her chief support. Claim is based on section 4 of the act of June 10, 1922, 42 Stat. 625,628, and, under the many uniform decisions of this court, plaintiff is entitled to recover increased rental and subsistence allowances from March 25, 1935 to March 3, 1937. Tomlinson v. United Stapes, 66 C. Cls. 697; Samouce v. United States, 69 C. Cls. 65; and Culver v. United States, 81 C. Cls. 631.

Plaintiff is entitled to recover $1,725.86. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Galante v. United States, 96 Ct. Cl. 128, 1942 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 96, 1942 WL 4397 (cc 1942).

96 Ct. Cl. 128 (Galante v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tomlinson v. United States
66 Ct. Cl. 697 (Court of Claims, 1929)
Samouce v. United States
69 Ct. Cl. 65 (Court of Claims, 1930)
Culver v. United States
81 Ct. Cl. 631 (Court of Claims, 1935)