Galante v. United States
This text of 96 Ct. Cl. 128 (Galante v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[130]*130The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to re-
cover, in an opinion
as follows:
The facts in this case are not in dispute. They show plainly that plaintiff’s mother was in fact dependent upon him for her chief support. Claim is based on section 4 of the act of June 10, 1922, 42 Stat. 625,628, and, under the many uniform decisions of this court, plaintiff is entitled to recover increased rental and subsistence allowances from March 25, 1935 to March 3, 1937. Tomlinson v. United Stapes, 66 C. Cls. 697; Samouce v. United States, 69 C. Cls. 65; and Culver v. United States, 81 C. Cls. 631.
Plaintiff is entitled to recover $1,725.86. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 Ct. Cl. 128, 1942 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 96, 1942 WL 4397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galante-v-united-states-cc-1942.