Galandauer v. Brookdale Hospital Medical Center

274 A.D.2d 448, 710 N.Y.S.2d 396, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7853
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 17, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 274 A.D.2d 448 (Galandauer v. Brookdale Hospital Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Galandauer v. Brookdale Hospital Medical Center, 274 A.D.2d 448, 710 N.Y.S.2d 396, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, etc., the defendant Jerry Bloom appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), entered November 3, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $235,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On December 6, 1993, the plaintiffs decedent, Imre Gal and[449]*449auer, sought treatment for pain on his right side from the appellant. After ordering blood tests, the appellant diagnosed that the decedent had hepatitis and prescribed rest. When the decedent’s condition worsened, the defendant referred him to a gastroenterologist, who ordered that a sonogram be performed. The decedent died on January 20, 1994, following surgery which revealed widespread metastatic cancer and an enlarged liver.

Following trial, the jury found that the appellant’s failure to order a sonogram hastened the decedent’s death, and awarded damages for wrongful death and pain and suffering.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, there was sufficient evidence from which a jury could rationally conclude that he was negligent and that his negligence was a proximate cause of the decedent’s pain and suffering in the six-week period between the decedent’s first visit to the appellant and the decedent’s death (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493; Flowers v Southampton Hosp., 215 AD2d 723). Moreover, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, Simmons v East Nassau Med. Group, 260 AD2d 463).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Joy, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gaspard v. Aronoff
2017 NY Slip Op 6258 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Rose v. Zinberg
128 A.D.3d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Stewart v. Olean Medical Group, P.C.
17 A.D.3d 1094 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 A.D.2d 448, 710 N.Y.S.2d 396, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galandauer-v-brookdale-hospital-medical-center-nyappdiv-2000.