Galan Flores v. Star Food Mart And Deli Corp.

S.D. New York

Galan Flores v. Star Food Mart And Deli Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 23, 2025·No. 1:23-cv-06472·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JOSE FELIX GALAN FLORES et al.,

Plaintiffs, 23-cv-06472 (JW)

-against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL

STAR FOOD MAR AND DELI et al.,

Defendants.

JENNIFER E. WILLIS, United States Magistrate Judge: In this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law, which is before this Court on the consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties, having reached an agreement in principle to resolve the action, have placed their proposed settlement agreement before this Court for approval. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015) (requiring judicial fairness review of FLSA settlements). The parties have also submitted a letter detailing why they believe the proposed settlement agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Dkt. No. 38. This Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions in order to determine whether the proposed agreement represents a reasonable compromise of the claims asserted in this action, and, in light of the totality of the relevant circumstances, including the representations made in the parties’ letter and the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Court finds that the terms of the proposed settlement agreement are fair, reasonable, and adequate, both to redress Plaintiff’s claims in this action and to compensate Plaintiff's counsel for their legal fees, and the agreement is therefore approved. 2. As a result of the Court’s approval of the parties’ proposed settlement, this action is hereby discontinued with prejudice and without costs, provided, however, that, within 30 days of the date of this Order, if any aspect of written documentation of the settlement is not completed, then Plaintiff may apply by letter for the restoration of the action to the active calendar of the Court. 3. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close this case on the Docket of the Court. SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York January 28, 2025 Gpnifin E Wille United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JOSE FELIX GALAN FLORES et al.,

Plaintiffs, 23-cv-06472 (JW)

-against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL

STAR FOOD MAR AND DELI et al.,

Defendants.

JENNIFER E. WILLIS, United States Magistrate Judge: In this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law, which is before this Court on the consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties, having reached an agreement in principle to resolve the action, have placed their proposed settlement agreement before this Court for approval. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015) (requiring judicial fairness review of FLSA settlements). The parties have also submitted a letter detailing why they believe the proposed settlement agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Dkt. No. 38. This Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions in order to determine whether the proposed agreement represents a reasonable compromise of the claims asserted in this action, and, in light of the totality of the relevant circumstances, including the representations made in the parties’ letter and the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Court finds that the terms of the proposed settlement agreement are fair, reasonable, and adequate, both to redress Plaintiff’s claims in this action and to compensate Plaintiff's counsel for their legal fees, and the agreement is therefore approved. 2. As a result of the Court’s approval of the parties’ proposed settlement, this action is hereby discontinued with prejudice and without costs, provided, however, that, within 30 days of the date of this Order, if any aspect of written documentation of the settlement is not completed, then Plaintiff may apply by letter for the restoration of the action to the active calendar of the Court. 3. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close this case on the Docket of the Court. SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York January 28, 2025 Gpnifin E Wille United States Magistrate Judge

Galan Flores v. Star Food Mart And Deli Corp., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Galan Flores v. Star Food Mart And Deli Corp. (Galan Flores v. Star Food Mart And Deli Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related