Gaither v. Wasson

42 Ark. 126
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 15, 1883·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

English, O. J.

It appears from the record, as amended, that this case being ready for hearing on bill, answer and depositions, and the regular judge being disqualified to sit in the case, it was submitted by consent of the solicitors of the parties, to James A. Wilson, Esq., as special judge, ■who as such heard the case, and rendered the decree in favor of Wasson and wife. Appealed from by Gaither.

A special judge must be elected by the attorneys of the court, as prescribed by the Constitution, and can not be agreed on by the parties to a suit, and a judgment or decree rendered by a special judge selected by agreement, is corara non judice and void, as held in Dansby v. Beard, 39 Ark., 254.

The decree must be reversed, set aside and held for naught, and the cause remanded to be heard anew by a competent court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaither v. Wasson, 42 Ark. 126 (Ark. 1883).

42 Ark. 126 (Gaither v. Wasson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Shipley
517 S.W.2d 210 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1975)
Abercrombie v. Green
362 S.W.2d 12 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1962)
Kory v. Dodge
298 S.W. 505 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1927)
Gordon v. Reeves
267 S.W. 133 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1924)
Summerlin v. State
153 S.W. 890 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Stites
95 S.W. 1004 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1906)
Arkadelphia Lumber Co. v. Asman
79 S.W. 1060 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1904)
Railway Co. v. Parks
29 S.W. 464 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1895)
Railway Co. v. Sageley
20 S.W. 413 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1892)