GAITHER v. BOBBITT

S.D. Georgia

GAITHER v. BOBBITT

DecidedMarch 13, 2020

Docket6:20-cv-00004

StatusUnknown

This text of GAITHER v. BOBBITT (GAITHER v. BOBBITT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

GAITHER v. BOBBITT, (S.D. Ga. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION RUSSELL GAITHER, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:20-cv-4 v. BOBBIT, Defendant. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, (doc. 8). Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, (doc. 10-1). The Court finds Plaintiff’s objections unavailing. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs objections and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 2), DISMISSES without prejudice the above-captioned case, DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this lawsuit, he must initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002) (per curiam). SO ORDERED, this 13th day of March, 2020. f S Lye R. STAN BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION RUSSELL GAITHER, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:20-cv-4 v. BOBBIT, Defendant. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, (doc. 8). Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, (doc. 10-1). The Court finds Plaintiff’s objections unavailing. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs objections and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 2), DISMISSES without prejudice the above-captioned case, DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this lawsuit, he must initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002) (per curiam). SO ORDERED, this 13th day of March, 2020. f S Lye R. STAN BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

GAITHER v. BOBBITT, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaither-v-bobbitt-gasd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack