Gainey v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Gainey v. State

200 So. 363, 146 Fla. 26, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1068

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 4, 1941·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having been duly submitted upon the transcript of record and the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, all of which have been carefully considered by the Court, the majority of the Court are of the opinion that no reversible error appears in the record, and the judgment of the Court below is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Buford, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., Terrell and Chapman, J. J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having been duly submitted upon the transcript of record and the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, all of which have been carefully considered by the Court, the majority of the Court are of the opinion that no reversible error appears in the record, and the judgment of the Court below is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Buford, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., Terrell and Chapman, J. J., dissent.

Gainey v. State, 200 So. 363, 146 Fla. 26, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1068 (Fla. 1941).

Pincite

200 So. 363 (Gainey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.