Gainey v. Sexton's Administrator

29 Mo. 449
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided January 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Scott, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This judgment will be reversed. The probate court clearly erred in placing a judgment rendered in another state in the same class with those rendered in the courts of this state. The judgments of the sister states have no preference over any other debts. Only the judgments rendered in the courts of this state can be placed in the fourth class of demands. (Harness v. Green’s Adm’r, 20 Mo. 316.)

The bill of exceptions does not show but what the appeal was taken and the affidavit filed during the term of the court. The evidence disproving this is not preserved in the bill of exceptions.

The other judges concurring, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gainey v. Sexton's Administrator, 29 Mo. 449 (Mo. 1860).

29 Mo. 449 (Gainey v. Sexton's Administrator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Cook v. Brown
140 S.W.2d 42 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1940)
Second National Bank v. Blauvelt
44 N.J. Eq. 173 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1888)