Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. Wall

1 Ga. L. Rep. 13
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 13 (Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. Wall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. Wall, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 13 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Blandford, J.

This court has held in 64 Ga., 619, that, where it was shown that a mule was killed by a traip, the railroad company should produce all the witnesses present to show that the company was not at fault. When the engineer and fireman were both present, and only the former was sworn as a witness, this was a circumstance from which a jury might infer that, had the other witness been introduced, his testimony might have shown negligence on the part of the company; and the verdict against the company was not without evidence to support it. E. T., Va. & Ga. R. R. vs. Prather, (February term, 1885).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Cox
64 Ga. 619 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gainesville-jefferson-southern-railroad-v-wall-ga-1885.