Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. Martin

10 S.E. 542, 84 Ga. 61

Opinion

Blandford, Justice.

This was an action to recover damages on account of a breach of contract. The testimony of the plaintiff (the defendant in error) submitted on the trial of the case certainly tended to show that the contract set forth in the declaration was made between the parties, and that there was a breach thereof; and the damages found by the jury were not too large. The evidence was conflicting, and we cannot say that the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed„