Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. Martin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. Martin

10 S.E. 542, 84 Ga. 61

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 4, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 S.E. 542 (Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. Martin, 10 S.E. 542, 84 Ga. 61 (Ga. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Blandford, Justice.

This was an action to recover damages on account of a breach of contract. The testimony of the plaintiff (the defendant in error) submitted on the trial of the case certainly tended to show that the contract set forth [65]*65in the declaration was made between the parties, and that there was a breach thereof; and the damages found by the jury were not too large. The evidence was conflicting, and we cannot say that the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed„

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blandford, Justice.

This was an action to recover damages on account of a breach of contract. The testimony of the plaintiff (the defendant in error) submitted on the trial of the case certainly tended to show that the contract set forth [65]*65in the declaration was made between the parties, and that there was a breach thereof; and the damages found by the jury were not too large. The evidence was conflicting, and we cannot say that the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed„

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 S.E. 542, 84 Ga. 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gainesville-jefferson-southern-railroad-v-martin-ga-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack