Gaines v. Winthrop

2 Edw. Ch. 571, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 243, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3
New York Court of Chancery·Decided December 9, 1835·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor:

The contract for sale is sufficiently proved ; and enough was done to render it binding upon the testator, and the complainant is entitled to a specific performance of the same.

But the question is : where shall he look for title—who is to execute the proper conveyance ? The rule is that a contract to sell is a revocation in equity pro tanto of a prior will. Still, as to the legal estate, the will remains in force ; [572]*572the title passes to the devisee and he will be considered a trustee for the purchaser and compelled to convey in fulfilment of the contract: 1 Preston on Abs. 67 ; 3 ib. 260 ; 1 Sugden on Vendors, 183. (9 ed.) The devisees in this case are the persons to execute a deed to the complainant.

Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaines v. Winthrop, 2 Edw. Ch. 571, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 243, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3 (N.Y. 1835).

2 Edw. Ch. 571 (Gaines v. Winthrop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Call
65 Misc. 2d 751 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1970)
Wagstaff v. Marcy
25 Misc. 121 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)