Gaines v. Winthrop

2 Edw. Ch. 571, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 243, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedDecember 9, 1835
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Edw. Ch. 571 (Gaines v. Winthrop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaines v. Winthrop, 2 Edw. Ch. 571, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 243, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3 (N.Y. 1835).

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor:

The contract for sale is sufficiently proved ; and enough was done to render it binding upon the testator, and the complainant is entitled to a specific performance of the same.

But the question is : where shall he look for title—who is to execute the proper conveyance ? The rule is that a contract to sell is a revocation in equity pro tanto of a prior will. Still, as to the legal estate, the will remains in force ; [572]*572the title passes to the devisee and he will be considered a trustee for the purchaser and compelled to convey in fulfilment of the contract: 1 Preston on Abs. 67 ; 3 ib. 260 ; 1 Sugden on Vendors, 183. (9 ed.) The devisees in this case are the persons to execute a deed to the complainant.

Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Call
65 Misc. 2d 751 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1970)
Wagstaff v. Marcy
25 Misc. 121 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Edw. Ch. 571, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 243, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaines-v-winthrop-nychanct-1835.