Gaines v. State

301 S.W.2d 110, 164 Tex. Crim. 516, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 957
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 31, 1956
DocketNo. 28,504
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 301 S.W.2d 110 (Gaines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaines v. State, 301 S.W.2d 110, 164 Tex. Crim. 516, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 957 (Tex. 1956).

Opinions

WOODLEY, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for transporting liquor in a dry area; the punishment, 6 months in jail and a fine of $500.

The record shows that appellant’s recognizance on appeal was set and he was remanded to custody of the sheriff of Coleman County, Texas, on March 8, 1956, on which date his motion for new trial was overruled.

No recognizance or appeal bond is found in the record, and there is no showing that appellant is now in custody of the sheriff of Coleman County or in the Coleman County Jail awaiting the action of this court on his appeal

Under Art. 830 V.A.C.C.P. the record on appeal, to give this court jurisdiction, must show a bond or recognizance on appeal, or that the appellant has been continuously in jail since his motion for new trial was overruled. White v. State, 87 Texas Cr. Rep. 315, 221 S.W. 283; Grant v. State, 110 Texas Cr. Rep. 9, 7 S.W. 2d 90.

The appeal is dismissed.

ON appellant’s motion to reinstate appeal

The record having been perfected so as to show that appellant has been confined in jail at all times since his notice of appeal, the appeal is reinstated.

The affidavit or complaint upon which the information was predicated is fatally defective. It states only that the affiant “has good reason to believe” that the offense was committed, [518]*518but nowhere is it stated that the affiant “does believe * * Ayres v. State, 156 Texas Cr. Rep. 622, 245 S.W. 2d 706.

The complaint being insufficient to support the information, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Drone v. State
329 S.W.2d 282 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 S.W.2d 110, 164 Tex. Crim. 516, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaines-v-state-texcrimapp-1956.