Gaines v. State

658 So. 2d 615, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7740, 1995 WL 421277
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gaines v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 706 So. 2d 47
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 1995·No. No. 94-02630·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence for robbery. We strike that portion of the condition of probation prohibiting excessive use of intoxicants because that requirement was not pronounced at sentencing. See Tomlinson v. State, 645 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We further strike the imposition of $33 for a “cost/fine,” $2 pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), and $493.62 in extradition costs. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Upon remand, the state may seek to reimpose such costs after complying with Reyes.

Affirmed as modified.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaines v. State, 658 So. 2d 615, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7740, 1995 WL 421277 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

658 So. 2d 615 (Gaines v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tomlinson v. State
645 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)