Gaines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gaines v. State

244 So. 2d 478, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6586

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 23, 1970

DocketNo. 69-747

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 244 So. 2d 478 (Gaines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gaines v. State, 244 So. 2d 478, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6586 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinions

OWEN, Judge.

Appellant’s sole point on this appeal from conviction of aggravated assault is whether the court erred in excluding testimony of the victim’s bad character and reputation for turbulence and violence.

Argument on this point presupposes that the defendant’s two witnesses would have so testified. However, the reporter’s transcript of the trial proceedings discloses that in the case of both witnesses the state made its objection immediately upon the witness being asked the question, “Are you familiar with [the victim’s] reputation in the community for violence ? ” In each instance the objection was sustained, and in neither instance did the defendant make a proffer to show- that the witness was in fact familiar with the victim’s reputation, and that such reputation was bad. Absent such proffer, we are precluded from considering the'question of whether the rulings assigned as error would warrant reversing the conviction.

Affirmed.

REED, J., concurs. CROSS, C. J., dissents, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OWEN, Judge.

Appellant’s sole point on this appeal from conviction of aggravated assault is whether the court erred in excluding testimony of the victim’s bad character and reputation for turbulence and violence.

Argument on this point presupposes that the defendant’s two witnesses would have so testified. However, the reporter’s transcript of the trial proceedings discloses that in the case of both witnesses the state made its objection immediately upon the witness being asked the question, “Are you familiar with [the victim’s] reputation in the community for violence ? ” In each instance the objection was sustained, and in neither instance did the defendant make a proffer to show- that the witness was in fact familiar with the victim’s reputation, and that such reputation was bad. Absent such proffer, we are precluded from considering the'question of whether the rulings assigned as error would warrant reversing the conviction.

Affirmed.

REED, J., concurs. CROSS, C. J., dissents, with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 So. 2d 478, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaines-v-state-fladistctapp-1970.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack