Gaines v. State
This text of 2014 Ark. App. 651 (Gaines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 651
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CR-13-860
Opinion Delivered November 19, 2014 TONYA RENEE GAINES APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. CR-2008-1131]
STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE RANDY APPELLEE F. PHILHOURS
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge
Tonya Renee Gaines appeals from the order revoking her probation and
sentencing her to twenty-four months in a Community Correction Center with ninety-
six months’ suspended imposition of sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S.
738 (1967) and Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(k)(1) (2013), Gaines’s attorney has filed a no-merit
brief and a motion to withdraw, addressing all of the adverse rulings made at the
termination hearing, explaining why each adverse ruling is not a meritorious ground for
reversal, and requesting to be relieved as counsel. Gaines was provided with a copy of her
counsel’s brief and motion and informed of her rights to file pro se points. She has not
done so.
The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error, but
rather whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. Tucker v. State, 47 Ark. App. 96, 885
1 Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 651
S.W.2d 904 (1994). We have reviewed the entire record and counsel’s brief and conclude
that Gaines’s counsel has adequately explained why there is no meritorious issue on
appeal. Therefore, pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark.
App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985), we issue this memorandum opinion granting counsel’s
motion to be relieved and affirming the court’s revocation.
Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
WALMSLEY and GRUBER, JJ., agree.
C. Brian Williams, for appellant.
No response.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ark. App. 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaines-v-state-arkctapp-2014.