Gaines v. State

2014 Ark. App. 651
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 19, 2014
DocketCR-13-860
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 2014 Ark. App. 651 (Gaines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaines v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 651 (Ark. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 651

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CR-13-860

Opinion Delivered November 19, 2014 TONYA RENEE GAINES APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. CR-2008-1131]

STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE RANDY APPELLEE F. PHILHOURS

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED

BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge

Tonya Renee Gaines appeals from the order revoking her probation and

sentencing her to twenty-four months in a Community Correction Center with ninety-

six months’ suspended imposition of sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S.

738 (1967) and Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(k)(1) (2013), Gaines’s attorney has filed a no-merit

brief and a motion to withdraw, addressing all of the adverse rulings made at the

termination hearing, explaining why each adverse ruling is not a meritorious ground for

reversal, and requesting to be relieved as counsel. Gaines was provided with a copy of her

counsel’s brief and motion and informed of her rights to file pro se points. She has not

done so.

The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error, but

rather whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. Tucker v. State, 47 Ark. App. 96, 885

1 Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 651

S.W.2d 904 (1994). We have reviewed the entire record and counsel’s brief and conclude

that Gaines’s counsel has adequately explained why there is no meritorious issue on

appeal. Therefore, pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark.

App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985), we issue this memorandum opinion granting counsel’s

motion to be relieved and affirming the court’s revocation.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

WALMSLEY and GRUBER, JJ., agree.

C. Brian Williams, for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ivan Santos v. State of Arkansas
2025 Ark. App. 6 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2025)
Pugh-Hayes v. State
2017 Ark. App. 54 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2017)
Jefferson v. State
2017 Ark. App. 31 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2017)
Baxley v. State
2017 Ark. App. 6 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2017)
Wooley v. State
2016 Ark. App. 343 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2016)
Myers v. State
2016 Ark. App. 329 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2016)
Hardy v. State
2015 Ark. App. 372 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2015)
Kindle v. State
2015 Ark. App. 13 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ark. App. 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaines-v-state-arkctapp-2014.