Gaines v. Moffitt Pierce Constr.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedAugust 5, 2004
DocketI.C. NO. 941234
StatusPublished

This text of Gaines v. Moffitt Pierce Constr. (Gaines v. Moffitt Pierce Constr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaines v. Moffitt Pierce Constr., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2004).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Glenn and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award except for minor modifications. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Glenn with modifications.

***********
The Full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner and in and by a pre-trial agreement:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are properly before the North Carolina Industrial Commission and the North Carolina Industrial Commission has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter. The parties are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. An employer-employee relationship existed between the defendant-employer and the decedent at all relevant times herein.

3. The plaintiff, Lindsey Gaines, sustained an admittedly compensable injury on June 5, 1999, which resulted in death on that date.

4. Lindsey Gaines was survived by his wife, Linda Gaines, who is currently receiving death benefits.

5. Defendant-Carrier is Reliance Insurance Company, by and through the North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Association.

6. The decedent's average weekly wage was $941.00, which yields the maximum compensation rate of $560.00 per week.

7. Previously in this action, Deputy Commissioner Lorrie L. Dollar filed an interlocutory opinion and award on June 26, 2000. Pursuant to the above-referenced opinion and award, the following items are currently in documentary evidence in this matter:

a. An affidavit of Linda Gaines (4 pages);

b. Medical records of Linda Gaines (67 pages);

c. Birth certificate of Brittany Michelle Johnson; and,

d. Birth certificate of Joshua Dean Johnson.

8. The issues for hearing before the Deputy Commissioner were:

a. Whether or not plaintiff is entitled to death benefits after the expiration of 400 weeks from the date of the Decedent-Employee's death pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-38; and,

b. Whether the Industrial Commission can determine if plaintiff is entitled to lifetime benefits before the expiration of the statutorily mandated 400-week period.

***********
EVIDENTIARY RULINGS
At the first hearing before the Deputy Commissioner of this matter, plaintiff's counsel offered the decision of the Social Security Administration in support of Mrs. Gaines' claim. At that time, the Deputy Commissioner disallowed this item into evidence, stating that it was irrelevant to the determination at hand. In the months to follow, as the rehabilitation specialist for the defendant prepared his testimony, the Deputy Commissioner ordered plaintiff's counsel to produce Mrs. Gaines entire Social Security file to defendants. Thereafter at the second hearing before the Deputy Commissioner of this matter, when the testimony of the rehabilitation specialist was taken, the Deputy Commissioner changed his earlier ruling and allowed the entire Social Security record of Mrs. Gaines into evidence. Mr. Henderson had apparently based his rehabilitation report and opinion upon Mrs. Gaines Social Security record, and therefore the Deputy Commissioner changed his opinion on relevancy and entered the same into the record. The Full Commission finds these evidentiary rulings of the Deputy Commissioner to be proper.

***********
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record and reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following additional:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the admittedly compensable injury, the decedent plaintiff was 64 years old and was employed as a roll operator. He married Linda Gaines on July 28, 1973. The compensable injury and resulting death both occurred on June 5, 1999.

2. Pursuant to Deputy Commissioner Lorrie Dollar's order of June 26, 2000, the minors Joshua Dean Johnson and Brittany Michelle Johnson are each entitled to one-third shares of the death benefits payable to Linda Gaines over 400 weeks or until such time as each minor reaches age 18.

3. In 1972, Mrs. Gaines was in a severe motor vehicle accident in which her left hip was broken. This injury required left hip and leg open reduction and internal fixation, which resulted in the left leg becoming one inch shorter than the right leg. This chronic left leg deformity is the cause of the serious and debilitating current osteoarthritis in the left knee of Mrs. Gaines. Additionally as a result of this accident, Mrs. Gaines suffered a skull and right jaw fracture, with the jaw fracture requiring corrective surgery.

4. In 1996, Mrs. Gaines was the victim of another serious motor vehicle accident. As a result of this accident, Mrs. Gaines suffered a serious crush injury to her right ankle. This injury resulted in open reduction and internal fixation surgery on the right tibula/fibula. Mrs. Gaines continues to suffer pain and disability from this right leg injury.

5. The combination of the injuries of Mrs. Gaines left hip and right ankle has caused severe and pronounced osteoarthritis in both knees, which is worse on the left. Furthermore the combination of these conditions has caused a pronounced limp in Mrs. Gaines gait, the inability to stand for any prolonged periods, as well as the inability to squat or stand on heel or toes.

6. Mrs. Gaines made her initial application for Social Security disability income on March 31, 1999, three months prior to her husband's death. Mrs. Gaines stated that she had not worked since 1994. She stated her inability to work was because she no longer was able to sit or stand for any length of time due to pain in both legs.

7. Mrs. Gaines further cited the reasons for her inability to work in her March 1999 Social Security application in which she listed extremely high blood pressure that caused headaches and inability to concentrate, as well as a hiatal hernia, gallstones, and depression.

8. Mrs. Gaines' initial application for Social Security, as well as her request for reconsideration, was denied. Mrs. Gaines then re-filed with a new date of onset of June 5, 1999, for widow's disability benefits, and the Social Security Administration found Mrs. Gaines disabled and entitled to Title II benefits under Sections 202(e) and Sections 223 of the Social Security Act.

9. As of June 5, 1999, Mrs. Gaines was unable to support herself. She suffered from osteoarthritis, left lower extremity deformity, pain and depression with anxiety. These impairments prevented her from engaging in substantial gainful activity at any exertional level on a fulltime, consistent, competitive basis due to a combination of pain, depressive symptoms, and anxiety.

10. The medical evidence establishes that Mrs. Gaines experiences severe pain in her left knee that is exacerbated by right ankle pain and intermittent low back pain that has become constant, and that she has a deformity of the left leg, which is approximately one inch shorter than the right leg. Mrs. Gaines also has difficulty standing and pulling objects.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cockrell v. Evans Lumber Co.
407 S.E.2d 248 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)
Hedrick v. Southland Corp.
255 S.E.2d 198 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gaines v. Moffitt Pierce Constr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaines-v-moffitt-pierce-constr-ncworkcompcom-2004.