Gaines v. Adler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gaines v. Adler

15 A.D.2d 743, 223 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11659

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 6, 1962·Published

Opinion

Discoverable in the language of the complaint is the assertion, supported by allegations as to particular transactions, that the corporation has been in the past and is now being exploited exclusively for the private benefit of its managing and controlling stockholders. If plaintiffs should be able to establish this assertion, they might, in a proper case, be entitled to relief (Kroger v. Jaburg, 231 App. Div. 641; Lennan v. Blakeley, 273 App. Div. 767; cf. Fontheim v. Walker, 282 App. Div. 373, affd. 306 N. Y. 926). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Discoverable in the language of the complaint is the assertion, supported by allegations as to particular transactions, that the corporation has been in the past and is now being exploited exclusively for the private benefit of its managing and controlling stockholders. If plaintiffs should be able to establish this assertion, they might, in a proper case, be entitled to relief (Kroger v. Jaburg, 231 App. Div. 641; Lennan v. Blakeley, 273 App. Div. 767; cf. Fontheim v. Walker, 282 App. Div. 373, affd. 306 N. Y. 926). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Gaines v. Adler, 15 A.D.2d 743, 223 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

15 A.D.2d 743 (Gaines v. Adler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related