Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gainer v. State

Gainer v. State

889 So. 2d 111, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17760, 2004 WL 2725997
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 23, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-2816
StatusPublished

This text of 889 So. 2d 111 (Gainer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gainer v. State, 889 So. 2d 111, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17760, 2004 WL 2725997 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tommy Lee Gainer, challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress. Concluding that the officer did not have the reasonable suspi[112]*112cion to justify an investigatory stop, we reverse the suppression order and remand for appellant’s judgment and sentence to be reversed. See Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185 (Fla.1993); Batson v. State, 847 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); A.H. v. State, 693 So.2d 89 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ERVIN, PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Popple v. State
626 So. 2d 185 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Batson v. State
847 So. 2d 1149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
A.H. v. State
693 So. 2d 89 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 So. 2d 111, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17760, 2004 WL 2725997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gainer-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.