Gainer v. State

787 So. 2d 145, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5606, 2001 WL 427609
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 2001·No. No. 2D99-4283·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Benjamin Gainer appeals an order revoking his probation. We affirm the revocation because there was competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding that Mr. Gainer violated conditions 3, 9, 12, and M of his probation. The written order of revocation, however, does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement, in that it includes a finding that Mr. Gainer also violated condition 5. Mr. Gainer preserved this error by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2).1 The State has conceded error. We therefore remand with directions to the trial court to strike that portion of the order finding a violation of condition 5.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

PATTERSON, C.J., and THREADGILL and ALTENBERND, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gainer v. State, 787 So. 2d 145, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5606, 2001 WL 427609 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

787 So. 2d 145 (Gainer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.