Gailfoil v. Dixie

637 So. 2d 378, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5555, 1994 WL 243963
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 7, 1994·No. No. 93-2733·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Robert R. Gailfoil, appeals a denial of his unemployment benefits. We reverse.

Succinctly, appellant took on a job that he was physically unable to perform. Unfortunately, he discovered this physical malady shortly after commencing employment. Regardless of the various contested facts, appellant was simply unable to physically continue at this job. Based upon this court’s recent decision in Vajda v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 610 So.2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), which relies upon Herman v. Florida Dep’t of Commerce, Indus. Relations Comm’n, 323 So.2d 608 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), we reverse and remand with directions to pay appellant’s unemployment benefits.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gailfoil v. Dixie, 637 So. 2d 378, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5555, 1994 WL 243963 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

637 So. 2d 378 (Gailfoil v. Dixie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herman v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
323 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Vajda v. FLORIDA UNEMP. APPEALS COM'N
610 So. 2d 645 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)