Gailfoil v. Dixie
This text of 637 So. 2d 378 (Gailfoil v. Dixie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Robert R. Gailfoil, appeals a denial of his unemployment benefits. We reverse.
Succinctly, appellant took on a job that he was physically unable to perform. Unfortunately, he discovered this physical malady shortly after commencing employment. Regardless of the various contested facts, appellant was simply unable to physically continue at this job. Based upon this court’s recent decision in Vajda v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 610 So.2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), which relies upon Herman v. Florida Dep’t of Commerce, Indus. Relations Comm’n, 323 So.2d 608 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), we reverse and remand with directions to pay appellant’s unemployment benefits.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
637 So. 2d 378, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5555, 1994 WL 243963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gailfoil-v-dixie-fladistctapp-1994.