Gail a Anderson v. Sears Roebuck and Company

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 18, 2014
Docket148301
StatusPublished

This text of Gail a Anderson v. Sears Roebuck and Company (Gail a Anderson v. Sears Roebuck and Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gail a Anderson v. Sears Roebuck and Company, (Mich. 2014).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 18, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

148301 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack GAIL A. ANDERSON, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 148301 COA: 318532 Genesee CC: 12-098914-NO SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. We further ORDER that trial court proceedings are stayed pending the completion of this appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 18, 2014 s0611 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gail a Anderson v. Sears Roebuck and Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gail-a-anderson-v-sears-roebuck-and-company-mich-2014.