Gagnon v. Planning Commission

593 A.2d 129, 219 Conn. 902, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 325
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 17, 1991·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn. App. 413, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the defendant City Planning Commission had authority to consider and approve a resubdivision application of a parcel of land where the original subdivision application concerning that parcel had not been recorded on the land records and was presently under appeal at the time the resubdivision application was considered?

“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the approval of a resubdivision application of a parcel of land which had been previously subdivided and which subdivision was under appeal, rendered the subdivision appeal moot?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gagnon v. Planning Commission, 593 A.2d 129, 219 Conn. 902, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 325 (Colo. 1991).

593 A.2d 129 (Gagnon v. Planning Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

F B New Hartford v. New Hartford Inland, No. Cv97-0074258 (Feb. 23, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 1581 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
F B New Hartford v. Plan. Z. Com., No. Cv97-0074373 (Feb. 23, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 1571 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Gagnon v. Planning Commission
608 A.2d 1181 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)