Gagnon v. Planning Commission
This text of 593 A.2d 129 (Gagnon v. Planning Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn. App. 413, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the defendant City Planning Commission had authority to consider and approve a resubdivision application of a parcel of land where the original subdivision application concerning that parcel had not been recorded on the land records and was presently under appeal at the time the resubdivision application was considered?
“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the approval of a resubdivision application of a parcel of land which had been previously subdivided and which subdivision was under appeal, rendered the subdivision appeal moot?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
593 A.2d 129, 219 Conn. 902, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gagnon-v-planning-commission-conn-1991.