Gagnon v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville St. Ry.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Gagnon v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville St. Ry.

102 A. 778, 117 Me. 553, 1918 Me. LEXIS 6

DecidedJanuary 29, 1918

StatusPublished

This text of 102 A. 778 (Gagnon v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville St. Ry.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gagnon v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville St. Ry., 102 A. 778, 117 Me. 553, 1918 Me. LEXIS 6 (Me. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

This action is for damages to plaintiff’s automobile which was struck by defendant’s car, at the intersection of Chestnut and Lisbon Streets, in Lewiston. The only dispute is as to the facts and there is sufficient evidence to justify the jury’s verdict of $169.50 in the plaintiff’s favor. The motion filed by the defendant is therefore overruled. McGillicuddy & Morey, for plaintiff. Newell & Woodside, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This action is for damages to plaintiff’s automobile which was struck by defendant’s car, at the intersection of Chestnut and Lisbon Streets, in Lewiston. The only dispute is as to the facts and there is sufficient evidence to justify the jury’s verdict of $169.50 in the plaintiff’s favor. The motion filed by the defendant is therefore overruled. McGillicuddy & Morey, for plaintiff. Newell & Woodside, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A. 778, 117 Me. 553, 1918 Me. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gagnon-v-lewiston-augusta-waterville-st-ry-me-1918.