Gagnon v. Brue
This text of 398 P.2d 6 (Gagnon v. Brue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs appeal from an order dismissing their action with prejudice entered after the trial court granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict.
Plaintiff husband, a guest at defendants’ motel, dived into a swimming pool, hit the bottom, and was injured. The trial court found that plaintiffs had failed to establish a prima facie case of negligence against defendants. Further elaboration would be of no precedent value and would add nothing to the decisional law of this jurisdiction.
We have read the record and have concluded that the trial court did not err when it dismissed the action.
The judgment is affirmed.
March 4, 1965. Petition for rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
398 P.2d 6, 65 Wash. 2d 947, 1965 Wash. LEXIS 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gagnon-v-brue-wash-1965.