Gagger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gagger v. State

699 So. 2d 347, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10840, 1997 WL 594124

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 26, 1997

DocketNo. 97-2116

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 699 So. 2d 347 (Gagger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gagger v. State, 699 So. 2d 347, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10840, 1997 WL 594124 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Chief Judge.

Defendant, Curtis Gagger, appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence. On November 15, 1993, defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender to seven years incarceration in Case No. 93-302 for sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine, concurrent with three and one-haif years incarceration for possession of cocaine in Case No. 93-242. Defendant claims that he was improperly sentenced as a habitual felony offender since his convictions were for drug offenses excluded from the operation of the habitual offender statute. Section 775.084(l)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1993), does not permit habitualization when both the felony for which the defendant is to be sentenced and one of the two prior felony convictions is a violation of section 893.13, Florida Statutes, relating to the purchase or possession of a controlled substance.

The lower court entered a cogent order explaining that the effective date of section 775.084(l)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1993), was June 17, 1993. See Ch. 93-406, §§ 2, 44, Laws of Fla. The underlying offenses were committed in Case No. 93-242 on January [348]*34828, 1993, and in Case No. 93-302 on December 16, 1992. The statute in effect at the time defendant committed his crimes is controlling, and such statute did not contain the exclusion provision. See Bond v. State, 675 So.2d 184 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 684 So.2d 1350 (Fla.1996).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, Chief Judge.

Defendant, Curtis Gagger, appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence. On November 15, 1993, defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender to seven years incarceration in Case No. 93-302 for sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine, concurrent with three and one-haif years incarceration for possession of cocaine in Case No. 93-242. Defendant claims that he was improperly sentenced as a habitual felony offender since his convictions were for drug offenses excluded from the operation of the habitual offender statute. Section 775.084(l)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1993), does not permit habitualization when both the felony for which the defendant is to be sentenced and one of the two prior felony convictions is a violation of section 893.13, Florida Statutes, relating to the purchase or possession of a controlled substance.

The lower court entered a cogent order explaining that the effective date of section 775.084(l)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1993), was June 17, 1993. See Ch. 93-406, §§ 2, 44, Laws of Fla. The underlying offenses were committed in Case No. 93-242 on January [348]*34828, 1993, and in Case No. 93-302 on December 16, 1992. The statute in effect at the time defendant committed his crimes is controlling, and such statute did not contain the exclusion provision. See Bond v. State, 675 So.2d 184 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 684 So.2d 1350 (Fla.1996).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

699 So. 2d 347, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10840, 1997 WL 594124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gagger-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack