Gage v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Gage v. State

29 Ohio St. 6

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1875

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 Ohio St. 6 (Gage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gage v. State, 29 Ohio St. 6 (Ohio 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Leave must be refused. There was but one arrest, and therefore the question whether a second arrest could be made in the same case does not arise. The defendant was not in custody, either of his bail or of the state. He was at large, and the state had a right to arrest him by either of the two processes provided by law, namely, by capias on the indictments, or by complaint before a justice of the peace.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Leave must be refused. There was but one arrest, and therefore the question whether a second arrest could be made in the same case does not arise. The defendant was not in custody, either of his bail or of the state. He was at large, and the state had a right to arrest him by either of the two processes provided by law, namely, by capias on the indictments, or by complaint before a justice of the peace.

Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Ohio St. 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gage-v-state-ohio-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack