Gage v. People of the State of California
This text of Gage v. People of the State of California (Gage v. People of the State of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KENNETH EUGENE GAGE, Case No. 24-cv-02100-HSG
8 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; 9 v. REQUIRING PETITIONER TO PAY FILING FEE IN FULL 10 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 5 11 Respondent. 12 13 Petitioner, an inmate housed at California State Prison – Solano, has filed this pro se 14 petition for a writ of habeas corpus, challenging the legality of a conviction and sentence from 15 Santa Clara County Superior Court. Dkt. No. 1. Petitioner has requested to proceed in forma 16 pauperis. Dkt. Nos. 2, 5. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the requests to 17 proceed in forma pauperis and ORDERS Petitioner to pay the filing fee in full in order to proceed 18 with this action. 19 DISCUSSION 20 A plaintiff may commence an action without paying the Court’s filing fees when they 21 submit an affidavit stating that they lack sufficient funds to pay such fees. Escobedo v. Applebees, 22 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)). “An affidavit in support of an 23 [in forma pauperis] application is sufficient where it alleges that the affiant cannot pay the court 24 costs and still afford the necessities of life.” Id. (citing Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 25 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948)). If the person seeking to bring a civil action is a prisoner, they must 26 also submit a certified copy of their trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for 27 the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained from the 1 1915(a)(2). Here, Petitioner’s trust account statement shows an October 2023 balance of $940.90, 2 a April 2024 trust account balance of $758.27, a deposit of $250 on November 28, 2023, a deposit 3 || of $250 on January 26, 2024, and monthly expenditures of between $90 - $150. Dkt. No. 2 at 2; 4 || Dkt. No. 5 at 4. Petitioner has sufficient funds to pay the $5 filing fee and still afford the 5 || necessities of life. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s requests to proceed in forma 6 || pauperis. Dkt. Nos. 2,5. Petitioner may proceed with this action only if he prepays the $5 filing 7 fee. Petitioner must pay the full filing fee within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this order, 8 or this action will be dismissed without further notice to Petitioner and without prejudice for 9 || failure to pay the filing fee. 10 CONCLUSION 11 For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s request to proceed in forma 12 || pauperis. Dkt. Nos. 2,5. Petitioner may proceed with this action only if he prepays the $5 filing 13 fee in full. Petitioner must pay the $5 filing fee within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this 14 || order, or this action will be dismissed without further notice to Petitioner and without prejudice for 3 15 failure to pay the filing fee. a 16 This order terminates Dkt. Nos. 2, 5. IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 || Dated: 7/31/2024
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 20 United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gage v. People of the State of California, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gage-v-people-of-the-state-of-california-cand-2024.