Gage v. Gannet
This text of 10 Mass. 176 (Gage v. Gannet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It does not appear, on the face of the record before us, that the county is directly interested. But the defendants have waived this exception, by appearing and pleading to the action in the court below. It is true that in Prince’s case there was also an appearance for the defendant; but there the defect of jurisdiction was apparent on the face of the record,
Motion overruled.
[Vide Pearce vs. Atwood, 13 Mass. Rep. 324. — Commonwealth vs. Ryan, 5 Mass. Rep. 90. — Brown vs. Inhab. Somerset, 11 Mass. Rep. 221. — Boston vs. Tileston 11 Mass. Rep. 468. — Commonwealth vs. Worcester, 3 Pick. 464. — Ed.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Mass. 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gage-v-gannet-mass-1813.