Gage v. Adm'r. of Johnson
This text of 12 S.C.L. 492 (Gage v. Adm'r. of Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of tbe court.
it appears that the items objected to, when added to the balance due on the note, amount precisely to the difference between the amount of the account and the verdict. It is unnecessary therefore to notice further the first ground.
That one executor could discharge a debt due to his testator, has never been denied; sdme doubt however, formerly existed as to the power of a co-administrator. [493]*493But in the case of Williard vs. Fenn,---after repeated arguments the Court of King’s Bench, ruled that a co-administrator was possessed of the same power in this respect as a co-executor. This has been regarded as settled doctrine ever since, and is not now to.be disturbed.
The motion is refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 S.C.L. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gage-v-admr-of-johnson-sc-1821.