Gaffney v. Muhammad Ali Enterprises LLC

S.D. New York

Gaffney v. Muhammad Ali Enterprises LLC

DecidedOctober 6, 2023

Docket1:18-cv-08770

StatusUnknown

This text of Gaffney v. Muhammad Ali Enterprises LLC (Gaffney v. Muhammad Ali Enterprises LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gaffney v. Muhammad Ali Enterprises LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x MICHAEL GAFFNEY, : : Plaintiff, : 18-CV-8770 (GBD) (OTW) : 23-CV-5669 (GBD) (OTW) -against- : : MUHAMMAD ALI ENTERPRISES LLC, et al., : Defendants. : OPINION & ORDER : -------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s motion to consolidate 23-CV-5669 (“the 2023 Action”) with the related actions 18-CV-8770 (“the 2018 Action”) and 20-CV-7113.1 (ECF 20). Under Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court may, in its discretion, deny consolidation when the individual cases are at vastly different procedural stages and consolidation would delay the processing of one of the individual cases or waste judicial resources. Ekpe v. City of New York, 2021 WL 5999204, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2021); In re 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties, 2020 WL 1124767, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2020). That is the case here. The 2018 Action is trial-ready and is scheduled for trial in March 2024. Plaintiff filed the 2023 Action as an end-run around Judge Daniels’s prior rulings denying Plaintiff’s belated request to add back three photos into the 2018 Action that Plaintiff had previously conceded were not in issue. See Case No. 1:18-cv-8770, ECF Nos. 151 at 1-2; 179 at 4; 200. The 2023 Action also raises claims regarding ten new photos that were never litigated or raised in 1 20-CV-7113 was consolidated with the 2018 Case on September 9, 2021. (Case No. 1:18-cv-8770, ECF 109). the 2018 Action. See Case No. 1:18-cv-8770, ECF 125. Consolidating these cases would cause delay and prejudice and waste judicial resources. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to consolidate (ECF 20) is DENIED. Plaintiff’s letter motion to seal (ECF 19) is DENIED AS MOOT.

The 2023 Action is STAYED pending the outcome of the trial in the 2018 Action. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF Nos. 19 and 20. SO ORDERED.

s/ Ona T. Wang Dated: October 6, 2023 Ona T. Wang New York, New York United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x MICHAEL GAFFNEY, : : Plaintiff, : 18-CV-8770 (GBD) (OTW) : 23-CV-5669 (GBD) (OTW) -against- : : MUHAMMAD ALI ENTERPRISES LLC, et al., : Defendants. : OPINION & ORDER : -------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s motion to consolidate 23-CV-5669 (“the 2023 Action”) with the related actions 18-CV-8770 (“the 2018 Action”) and 20-CV-7113.1 (ECF 20). Under Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court may, in its discretion, deny consolidation when the individual cases are at vastly different procedural stages and consolidation would delay the processing of one of the individual cases or waste judicial resources. Ekpe v. City of New York, 2021 WL 5999204, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2021); In re 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties, 2020 WL 1124767, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2020). That is the case here. The 2018 Action is trial-ready and is scheduled for trial in March 2024. Plaintiff filed the 2023 Action as an end-run around Judge Daniels’s prior rulings denying Plaintiff’s belated request to add back three photos into the 2018 Action that Plaintiff had previously conceded were not in issue. See Case No. 1:18-cv-8770, ECF Nos. 151 at 1-2; 179 at 4; 200. The 2023 Action also raises claims regarding ten new photos that were never litigated or raised in 1 20-CV-7113 was consolidated with the 2018 Case on September 9, 2021. (Case No. 1:18-cv-8770, ECF 109). the 2018 Action. See Case No. 1:18-cv-8770, ECF 125. Consolidating these cases would cause delay and prejudice and waste judicial resources. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to consolidate (ECF 20) is DENIED. Plaintiff’s letter motion to seal (ECF 19) is DENIED AS MOOT.

The 2023 Action is STAYED pending the outcome of the trial in the 2018 Action. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF Nos. 19 and 20. SO ORDERED.

s/ Ona T. Wang Dated: October 6, 2023 Ona T. Wang New York, New York United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Gaffney v. Muhammad Ali Enterprises LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaffney-v-muhammad-ali-enterprises-llc-nysd-2023.