Gaff v. Theis

33 Ind. 307
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 33 Ind. 307 (Gaff v. Theis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaff v. Theis, 33 Ind. 307 (Ind. 1870).

Opinion

Frazer, J.

This was a suit against the appellants, who were the president and directors of an incorporated manufacturing company, known as “ The Aurora Brewing aud Malting Company,” to recover from them personally an indebtedness due to the plaintiff from the corporation by a note signed “ C. C. Kelsey, Ass’t Sec’y Aurora Brewing and Malting Company,” under the provision of the fifteenth section of the act providing for the incorporation of such companies, 1 G. & H. 427.

The complaint made a case fully within the meaning of the statute, and there was therefore no error in overruling' a demurrer to it. It is argued that directors are not officers within the meaning of the act imposing the liability, but an attentive reading of it seems to us to be very convincing that this position is not correct. Though penal statutes should be strictly construed, yet such construction cannot be pushed to the extent of disregarding the plain letter and spirit of the act.

Then it is argued that the note was not the note of the corporation, though expressly alleged (and distinctly proved) to be such; but that upon its face it appeared to be the note of C. C. Kelsey, and that the superadded words, “Ass’t Sec’y Aurora Brewing and Malting Company,” were merely a description of the person. A party may, we suppose, execute a note by any name, other than his own, and yet be bound by it, and this must apply as well to a corporation as to a natural person. "We perceive no error in overruling the demurrer to the complaint, nor, indeed, in any of the proceedings.

Affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Second National Bank v. Midland Steel Co.
52 L.R.A. 307 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1900)
Holt v. Sweetzer
55 N.E. 254 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1899)
Swarts v. Cohen
2 Ind. App. 20 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1894)
Hasselman v. Japanese Development Co.
27 N.E. 318 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1891)
Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Caldwell
98 Ind. 245 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Johnson v. Gibson
78 Ind. 282 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Armstrong v. Kirkpatrick
79 Ind. 527 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Gaff v. Garnier
37 Ind. 229 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Ind. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaff-v-theis-ind-1870.