Gaff v. Gottfried. Hack v. Same

128 U.S. 170, 9 S. Ct. 87, 32 L. Ed. 395, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2205
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 5, 1888
Docket36
StatusPublished

This text of 128 U.S. 170 (Gaff v. Gottfried. Hack v. Same) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaff v. Gottfried. Hack v. Same, 128 U.S. 170, 9 S. Ct. 87, 32 L. Ed. 395, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2205 (1888).

Opinion

128 U.S. 170

9 S.Ct. 87

32 L.Ed. 395

GAFF et al.
v.
GOTTFRIED.
HACK et al.
v.
SAME.

November 5, 1888.

R. H. Parkinson, for appellant.

E. Banning and T. A. Banning, for appellee.

BLATCHFORD, J.

These are appeals by the defendants in two suits brought by Matthew Gottfried, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Indiana, upon the same patent involved in the case of Brewing Co. v. Gottfried, ante, 83, (just decided.) The proofs are the same as in that case, and the same conclusions are reached. The decree in each case is reversed, and each case is remanded to the circuit court, with a direction to dismiss the bill of complaint, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. Finzer
128 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1888)
Johnson v. Christian
128 U.S. 374 (Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 U.S. 170, 9 S. Ct. 87, 32 L. Ed. 395, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaff-v-gottfried-hack-v-same-scotus-1888.