Gaff v. Gottfried. Hack v. Same

128 U.S. 170, 9 S. Ct. 87, 32 L. Ed. 395, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2205
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 5, 1888·No. 36·Published

Opinion

128 U.S. 170

9 S.Ct. 87

32 L.Ed. 395

GAFF et al.
v.
GOTTFRIED.
HACK et al.
v.
SAME.

November 5, 1888.

R. H. Parkinson, for appellant.

E. Banning and T. A. Banning, for appellee.

BLATCHFORD, J.

These are appeals by the defendants in two suits brought by Matthew Gottfried, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Indiana, upon the same patent involved in the case of Brewing Co. v. Gottfried, ante, 83, (just decided.) The proofs are the same as in that case, and the same conclusions are reached. The decree in each case is reversed, and each case is remanded to the circuit court, with a direction to dismiss the bill of complaint, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaff v. Gottfried. Hack v. Same, 128 U.S. 170, 9 S. Ct. 87, 32 L. Ed. 395, 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2205 (1888).

128 U.S. 170 (Gaff v. Gottfried. Hack v. Same) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. Finzer
128 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1888)
Johnson v. Christian
128 U.S. 374 (Supreme Court, 1888)