Gaede v. State
This text of 2022 ND 71 (Gaede v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT APRIL 14, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 71
Dennis James Gaede, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20210336
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Birch P. Burdick, State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief. Gaede v. State No. 20210336
[¶1] Dennis James Gaede appeals from an order denying his petition for postconviction relief. Gaede claims his 2018 diagnosis for post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”) is newly discovered evidence. The district court found Gaede’s PTSD diagnosis is not newly discovered evidence, and this claim was brought outside the statute of limitations provided in N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1- 01(3)(b). We conclude the court did not clearly err in finding Gaede’s claim is outside the statute of limitations in denying Gaede’s petition for postconviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 ND 71, 973 N.W.2d 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaede-v-state-nd-2022.