Gadson v. Rhodes

D. Arizona

Gadson v. Rhodes

DecidedNovember 2, 2020

Docket4:18-cv-00197-JGZ

StatusUnknown

This text of Gadson v. Rhodes (Gadson v. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gadson v. Rhodes, (D. Ariz. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 || Jermaine L. Gadson, No. CV-18-0197-TUC-JGZ (BGM) 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11]| v. R. L. Rhodes, 13 Respondent. 14 Currently pending before the Court is Petitioner Jermaine L. Gadson’s Request for || Transfer (Doc. 20). At the time Petitioner filed his Petition (Doc. 1), Petitioner was an || inmate incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tucson, Arizona (“FCI- 17|| Tucson”). See Petition (Doc. 1). In light of Petitioner’s incarceration at FCI—Tucson at the time of the Petition’s filing, this Court retains jurisdiction to consider the Petition. See Francis v. Rison, 894 F.2d 353 (9 Cir. 1990) (“jurisdiction attaches on the initial 20 || filing for habeas corpus relief, and it is not destroyed by a transfer of the petitioner and the accompanying custodial change.”) (citation omitted). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 22 || ORDERED that Petitioner’s Request for Transfer (Doc. 20) is DENIED. IT IS 23 || FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send Petitioner a copy of the 24 || docket sheet in this matter. 25 Dated this 2nd day of November, 2020. 26 27 Honorable Bruce G. Macdonald 28 United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 || Jermaine L. Gadson, No. CV-18-0197-TUC-JGZ (BGM) 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11]| v. R. L. Rhodes, 13 Respondent. 14 Currently pending before the Court is Petitioner Jermaine L. Gadson’s Request for || Transfer (Doc. 20). At the time Petitioner filed his Petition (Doc. 1), Petitioner was an || inmate incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tucson, Arizona (“FCI- 17|| Tucson”). See Petition (Doc. 1). In light of Petitioner’s incarceration at FCI—Tucson at the time of the Petition’s filing, this Court retains jurisdiction to consider the Petition. See Francis v. Rison, 894 F.2d 353 (9 Cir. 1990) (“jurisdiction attaches on the initial 20 || filing for habeas corpus relief, and it is not destroyed by a transfer of the petitioner and the accompanying custodial change.”) (citation omitted). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 22 || ORDERED that Petitioner’s Request for Transfer (Doc. 20) is DENIED. IT IS 23 || FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send Petitioner a copy of the 24 || docket sheet in this matter. 25 Dated this 2nd day of November, 2020. 26 27 Honorable Bruce G. Macdonald 28 United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Gadson v. Rhodes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gadson-v-rhodes-azd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack