Gadsen v. State

849 So. 2d 358, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6719, 2003 WL 21033263
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 2003·No. No. 2D02-3257·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

Christopher Gadsen appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. Although we approve the trial court’s conclusion that Gadsen is not entitled to relief under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), we reverse. Gadsen was habitualized for posession of cocaine, which is not among the enumerated felonies on which a defendant may be sentenced as a habitual felony offender. See § 775.084(l)(a)(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). We therefore reverse Gadsen’s habitual felony offender sentence for possession of cocaine and remand to the trial court for resen-tencing according to the sentencing guidelines in effect at the time of his offense. Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gadsen v. State, 849 So. 2d 358, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6719, 2003 WL 21033263 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

849 So. 2d 358 (Gadsen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Virgil v. State
884 So. 2d 373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Krieger v. Town of Longboat Key
849 So. 2d 358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)