Gadsden v. Sands & Co.

105 S.E. 286, 115 S.C. 205, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 206
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 20, 1920
Docket10538
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 105 S.E. 286 (Gadsden v. Sands & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gadsden v. Sands & Co., 105 S.E. 286, 115 S.C. 205, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 206 (S.C. 1920).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is an. appeal from a ruling made by his Honor, County Judge Whaley, and is a question simply of procedure. Upon the hearing of the case, plaintiff’s counsel declined to open his argument, and defendant’s counsel requested his Honor to instruct plaintiff’s counsel to do so. His Honor declined to do so, and exception was noted and appeal taken, and the error alleged is that this instruction should have been given. The exception is overruled. Defendant did not by answer admit the allegations of the complaint so as to become actor, so as to open and reply both as to evidence and argument.

The authorities relied on by appellant apply to such cases, and not to a case like this, where there is a contention simply as to argument, and not as to both evidence and argument.

The administration of law, justice, and the Courts must be practical and not technical. In no view of the case has appellant shown that they were prejudiced.

Judgment is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Hydrick and Eraser concur. Mr. Chiee Justice Gary and Mr. Justice Gage absent on account of sickness.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Marin
745 S.E.2d 148 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2013)
State v. Santiago
634 S.E.2d 23 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2006)
State v. Byrd
474 S.E.2d 430 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1996)
State v. Lowry
424 S.E.2d 649 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1992)
Battle v. State
409 S.E.2d 400 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)
State v. Fuller
377 S.E.2d 328 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1989)
State v. Harvey
68 S.E.2d 409 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1951)
State v. Nesmith
48 S.E.2d 595 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1948)
State v. Pridmore
161 S.E. 335 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
State v. Atterberry
124 S.E. 648 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E. 286, 115 S.C. 205, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gadsden-v-sands-co-sc-1920.