Gadsden State Bank v. Department of Banking

369 So. 2d 375, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14398
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 1979·No. No. JJ-392·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gadsden State Bank alleges that the hearing officer committed error in admitting certain evidence. However, after consideration of the briefs and the record on appeal, appellant has failed to demonstrate that the “fairness of the proceedings or the correctness of the action may have been impaired by a material error in procedure or a failure to follow prescribed procedure” or that the “agency’s action depends on any finding of fact that is not supported by competent substantial evidence in the record.” § 120.68(8) and (10) Fla.Stat. (1977). Appellant’s remaining point is without merit. Accordingly, the order of the agency is AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., ERVIN, J. and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gadsden State Bank v. Department of Banking, 369 So. 2d 375, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14398 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

369 So. 2d 375 (Gadsden State Bank v. Department of Banking) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. Florida Keys Community College
645 So. 2d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)