Gadsden State Bank v. Department of Banking
Opinion
Gadsden State Bank alleges that the hearing officer committed error in admitting certain evidence. However, after consideration of the briefs and the record on appeal, appellant has failed to demonstrate that the “fairness of the proceedings or the correctness of the action may have been impaired by a material error in procedure or a failure to follow prescribed procedure” or that the “agency’s action depends on any finding of fact that is not supported by competent substantial evidence in the record.” § 120.68(8) and (10) Fla.Stat. (1977). Appellant’s remaining point is without merit. Accordingly, the order of the agency is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
369 So. 2d 375 (Gadsden State Bank v. Department of Banking) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.