Gadlex Associates v. Greenspan & Jaffe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gadlex Associates v. Greenspan & Jaffe

129 A.D.2d 677, 514 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45363

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.D.2d 677 (Gadlex Associates v. Greenspan & Jaffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gadlex Associates v. Greenspan & Jaffe, 129 A.D.2d 677, 514 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45363 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover rents allegedly due pursuant to a written lease agreement, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 14, 1986, which, inter alia, upon a stipulated set of facts, determined that it is the obligation of the plaintiff under the terms of the subject lease to pay for the cleaning costs of the demised premises in an annual amount not to exceed the costs of cleaning the premises in the base year as recited in the lease, and is in favor of the defendants on their counterclaim in the principal amount of $17,371.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Ruskin at the Supreme Court, Westchester County. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover rents allegedly due pursuant to a written lease agreement, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 14, 1986, which, inter alia, upon a stipulated set of facts, determined that it is the obligation of the plaintiff under the terms of the subject lease to pay for the cleaning costs of the demised premises in an annual amount not to exceed the costs of cleaning the premises in the base year as recited in the lease, and is in favor of the defendants on their counterclaim in the principal amount of $17,371.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Ruskin at the Supreme Court, Westchester County. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.2d 677, 514 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gadlex-associates-v-greenspan-jaffe-nyappdiv-1987.