Gade v. Segelke

95 N.Y.S. 1129

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

So far as this motion is concerned, it would seem that the plaintiffs only seek recovery for damages incident to a wrongful ejectment, save the item of interest on $100, as to which there can be no recovery under the complaint in any event. Order affirmed, without costs.

HIRSCHBERG, P. J., and MILLER, J„ dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gade v. Segelke, 95 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

95 N.Y.S. 1129 (Gade v. Segelke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.