Gaddy v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Gaddy v. United States

332 F. App'x 822

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 2, 2009·No. No. 08-8425·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elijah James Gaddy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gaddy v. United States, No. 3:07-cv-03595-SB, 2008 WL 4330401 (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elijah James Gaddy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gaddy v. United States, No. 3:07-cv-03595-SB, 2008 WL 4330401 (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gaddy v. United States, 332 F. App'x 822 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

332 F. App'x 822 (Gaddy v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related