Gaddy v. Harrell

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 7, 2010
• Docket: 10-6964
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6964

TITUS ALPHONSO GADDY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

C. A. HARRELL, Doctor; NICOLE COZAIRER, Pharmacist,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:08-cv-00097-JAB-PTS)

Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 7, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Titus Alphonso Gaddy, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Kelly Elizabeth Street, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Titus Gaddy appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gaddy

v. Harrell, No. 1:08-cv-00097-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. June 29, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED