Gaddy v. Guardian Life Insurance
This text of 407 F. App'x 763 (Gaddy v. Guardian Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Susan Gaddy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gaddy v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., No. 6:09-cv-00837-HMH, 2010 WL 2926577 (D.S.C. July 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 F. App'x 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaddy-v-guardian-life-insurance-ca4-2011.