Gaddy v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
This text of 416 So. 2d 836 (Gaddy v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the Commission’s determination of Gaddy’s presumptive parole release date (PPRD). The record reveals that Gad-dy was advised of the aggravating factors used in determining his PPRD and he signed the examiner’s report.
There was no error in aggravating Gaddy’s PPRD for multiple separate offenses even if he was given concurrent sentences. Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.01(5); Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.01(5), note 7.
Also, there was no error in classifying Gaddy’s offense as a “Category VI, Greatest (Most Serious — I),” because “If an offense can be classified under more than one category, the most serious applicable category is to be used.” Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.05, note 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
416 So. 2d 836, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaddy-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1982.