Gaddy v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

416 So. 2d 836, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20325
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 18, 1982·No. No. AH-293·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

We affirm the Commission’s determination of Gaddy’s presumptive parole release date (PPRD). The record reveals that Gad-dy was advised of the aggravating factors used in determining his PPRD and he signed the examiner’s report.

There was no error in aggravating Gaddy’s PPRD for multiple separate offenses even if he was given concurrent sentences. Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.01(5); Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.01(5), note 7.

Also, there was no error in classifying Gaddy’s offense as a “Category VI, Greatest (Most Serious — I),” because “If an offense can be classified under more than one category, the most serious applicable category is to be used.” Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.05, note 3.

SHIVERS, J., and CAWTHON, VICTOR M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaddy v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 416 So. 2d 836, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20325 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

416 So. 2d 836 (Gaddy v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Variance v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
420 So. 2d 369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)