Gaddy v. Degeorgis
This text of 616 F. App'x 640 (Gaddy v. Degeorgis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Calvin Lyndale Gaddy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gaddy’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Gaddy has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Gaddy’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
616 F. App'x 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaddy-v-degeorgis-ca4-2015.