GACS Inc. v. Hagar

860 So. 2d 1102, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18814, 2003 WL 22927238
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 12, 2003
DocketNos. 1D03-2965 to 1D03-2970
StatusPublished

This text of 860 So. 2d 1102 (GACS Inc. v. Hagar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GACS Inc. v. Hagar, 860 So. 2d 1102, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18814, 2003 WL 22927238 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following the revocation of defense counsel’s pro hac vice status of David E. Larson and the denial of their motions to disqualify Judge Jean Johnson from presiding in the three trial court cases, GACS Incorporated and Ryder Automotive Operations, Inc. petition this court for prohibition relief and writs of certiorari to review the order revoking Mr. Larson’s pro hac vice status in each case.1 We conclude that the motions for disqualification were timely and facially sufficient; therefore, we grant the petitions for writ of prohibition. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.160; Dura-Stress, Inc. v. Law, 634 So.2d 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). We direct Judge Johnson to enter orders of disqualification and request that the Chief Circuit Judge assign a new judge to each of these cases.

[1103]*1103We also deny the petitions for certiorari without prejudice to allow petitioners to seek pro hac vice status of Mr. Larson with the newly assigned judge in each case.2

WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dura-Stress, Inc. v. Law
634 So. 2d 769 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
860 So. 2d 1102, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18814, 2003 WL 22927238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gacs-inc-v-hagar-fladistctapp-2003.