Gachot v. Heidelburger

109 N.Y.S. 803
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 10, 1908
StatusPublished

This text of 109 N.Y.S. 803 (Gachot v. Heidelburger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gachot v. Heidelburger, 109 N.Y.S. 803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant offered no testimony. The complaint was dismissed. In any event the request to go to the jury should have been granted, especially as it would seem that plaintiff’s evidence justified the direction of a verdict in his favor.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 N.Y.S. 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gachot-v-heidelburger-nyappterm-1908.